complained of, as far as the Opium licenses concerned. ... He also proposes that the Salt Weigher's tax, and in fact that nearly all taxes should be abolished, on the ground principally that their collection renders an objectionable interference on the part of the holders of these licenses necessary, and he states that a preventive service is kept up by the holders of the licenses for the purpose of maintaining their privileges.
From this position taken by Mr Campbell, but with the full impression that he believes his statement to be true, I must explicitly dissent. I assert that a preventive service is indeed necessary and has been in the Colony.
Since I have been in the Colony, I have made numerous and constant inquiries from Europeans and Natives on this subject, and this is the first time I have ever heard of such a body. I have reason to believe that Opium without a license is now sold in quantities under a chest not only by Chinese but by Europeans also. Before the strict monopoly was abolished by my predecessor in 1847, persons used to take out licenses from the Opium Farmer to enable them to retail Opium in less quantities than one chest, because he kept up a preventive service to uphold his rights, which were already observed under a strict monopoly.
I again repeat that I am satisfied there is no preventive service kept up by the holders of the Opium licenses, any more than there is by the other licensed dealers in spirits or any articles for which licenses are issued.
1
10.
complained of, as far as the Opium licenses
concerned. . . He also proposes
are
that the
Salt Weigher's tax, and in fact that
nearly
all. taxes should be abolished, the ground principally that their collection renders an objectionable, interference
on
the part of the holders of these licenses
necessary,
service is
and he states that
preventive. kept up by the holders of
the licenses for the purpose of amaintaining
their priviliges
10.
From this position
On/
the
part of Mr Campbell, but with the full impression that he believes his statement to be true, I must be q leave-
I that
moct explicitly to dessent. S'assert
Mo
tive service is kept up,
preventive
indeed is one.
necessary.
been in the Colony,
3202
Since I have
I have mader
numerous and constant inquiries from
216
Europeans and Natives on this subject, and this is the first time I have ever heard of such a body, and I have reason to believe that Opium without a
everry
41.
is now sold
license in quantities under a
cbest not only by Chinese beet by Curopeans also . Before the strict monopoly was abolished by my predecessor in 1847, persons used to take out licenses from the Opium Farmer, to enable them to retail. Opium in less quantities than one chest, because he kept up? a preventive
service to uphold his rights,
then,
which
wvere
already observed, a strict i
monopoly. I again repeat that. I and satisfied
there
is aro
· preventive service
kept up by the holders of the Opium lineseses, any
more
than there
are
by the
are
other
requisites.
licensed - dealers in spirits or any
articles for which licenses
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.